Philotimo
George Koukis Speaks Personally on
Doing What Is 'Right' without Regard to Cost
The year was 480 B.C. The enormous army of the Persian Empire—150,000 strong—under King Xerxes, supported by its immense navy, was approaching Greece’s eastern shore, planning to avenge its defeat at the hands of the Athenians at the Battle of Marathon during the first Persian invasion of Greece 10 years earlier. To advance into Greece, it would need to arrive through the narrow, mountainous coastal pass of Thermopylae.
Apprised of their attackers’ plans and knowing the great size of the enemy forces, Leonidas—King of Sparta—assembled an army of 6,000 to 7,000 soldiers en route to Thermopylae from an alliance of Greek city states—some with questionable allegiances—to thwart the invasion. Among Leonidas’ ranks, 300 of the soldiers were full citizens of Sparta—its most elite fighting corps—known both for their discipline and military prowess.
After two days of ferocious battle, Leonidas’ troops had dealt the Persians terrible losses, and the king’s plan to prevent the Persians from advancing through the pass at Thermopylae appeared successful—with Greek victory imminent. Soon, however, the Trachinian traitor Ephialtes conspired with the Persians to guide the enemy forces through a narrow and treacherous mountain path that allowed them an entry point for their attack and invasion, outflanking the Greek forces.
Encircled by the enemy, Leonidas dismissed members of his force—allowing them to leave and seek safety—while reaffirming that he and his Spartans would stay and fight. While most of the allies ultimately fled, just over 1,000 remained to guard their retreat—and fight to the death. Virtually all ultimately perished at the hands of the Persians.
So if you ask the question, “Did Leonidas and his small band of defenders ‘win’ this battle?” the obvious answer would seem to be that they did not, as they met their deaths on the battlefield against a far larger opposing force. Yet it is my contention that the answer is not so nearly straightforward; rather, it is dependent on one’s mindset and how one frames the story.
In the moment, on this third day of battle, this fierce and noble group came nowhere close to beating the multitudes of Persians stacked against them from a military perspective.
Yet, the choices and actions of these few men defined for an entire nation the value of honor and sacrifice in the name of what is “right”—with a call to Philotimo that has been associated with Greek culture ever since. But they achieved more still—unimaginably more. They achieved true greatness.
The choices made in this moment in time have informed the thinking and moral compass of generations around the globe. The story is captured and retold in film even today, to audiences who are viscerally moved more than 2000 years later, to witness historic individuals choose what is right and honorable, knowing that this choice will almost certainly cost them their lives.
And what did Leonidas and his Spartan fighting corps stand against, in this dramatic illustration of Philotimo? They stood in opposition to a force bent on conquering and domination for its own sake, motivations identical to what we see in so many of the seemingly unsolvable tragedies we witness around the globe today.
So in light of what we see that this group actually accomplished by virtue of their selfless acts of honor, I am of the opinion that this concept of Philotimo must become part of the fiber of who we are. It must become so integral to our thoughts and actions that it pervades our lives and our cultures. Only then will we ensure that the honor, dignity, respect, protection, and compassion we strive to demonstrate—as individuals, communities, business, and nations—will be returned to us just as freely in a world that we—through our diligent efforts and cultivated habits—have transformed for the better.
Practical Application for Ethical Leadership
Redefining Success with a Focus on 'Right' over Expediency or Gain